Do You Value Independent Arts Journalism & Would You Like To Help Us Produce More? Find Out More

Things you might have missed this week

Are you ready for Prime Minister Peter Dutton?

Last week, Fairfax political editor Peter Hartcher wrote that “Quietly, the Liberals’ expectation now is that Turnbull will not be leading them to the next election”. Hartcher is a mover-shaker in Canberra, and he also opined that while Julie Bishop had the numbers to replace Turnbull, Peter Dutton will be backed by those in the Coalition who, openly or secretly, prefer a leader whose only job outside of politics was being a Brisbane cop.

Dutton goes after journalists with the same mouth-frothing energy he uses for immigrants, environmentalists, Dustin Martin’s dad, and Jonny Depp’s dogs.

His family has a history of provoking outraged editorials, like this one: “Dutton has a fellow-feeling for big and wealthy land-sharks [who] form the class to be specially protected by legislation that will rob poorer men of their ordinary rights and privileges”.

That was in The Queensland Figaro in 1887 when the state Minister for Lands was Charlie Dutton, Peter’s great great grandfather. When BuzzFeed dug up this historical factet recently, a commenter cited historian Henry Reynolds saying that Charles angered the rural Queensland establishment by supporting Aboriginals’ land rights and their freedom from being slaughtered. As the online commenter Nevil Kinston-Brown said, “Sadly, these traits of mercy and reason seem not to have been inherited” by the present-day Dutton who really looks like a dickhead.

(The above photo of Peter Dutton was snapped and tweeted by Fairfax Media political reporter Stephanie Peatling, source: Twitter. The Immigration Minister asked that the ‘unflattering’ photo be removed from social media, which launched a host of more naughty versions.)

The other giant data-miners of America

I reported two weeks back on Cambridge Analytica, the company that ripped off data on 87 million US voters on Facebook to help Trump win, which is owned in the US by investment fund billionaire Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebecca. Investigative reporter Greg Palast points out that there are two other companies equally dedicated to subverting their nation’s elections, and also run by mega-wealthy Republicans.

Billionaire fossil fool brothers David and Charles Koch own i360, and “Bush’s brain” Karl Rove runs Data Trust, which manages online campaigning for the Republican National Committee.

All three outfits manipulate huge databases to target voters by cross-checking their prejudices. A recent issue of Zurich’s Das Magazin claimed that Cambridge Analytica “was able to evaluate a person better than the average work colleague, merely on the basis of ten Facebook ‘likes’. Seventy ‘likes’ were enough to outdo what a person’s friends knew, 150 what their parents knew, and 300 ‘likes’ what their partner knew. More ‘likes’ could even surpass what a person thought they knew about themselves.” That sounds like rolled gold bullshit, but ain’t it grand to know that with each ‘like’ you click on Facebook you’re contributing your few bits to another fake news-byte?

Meanwhile, ex-Cambridge employee Christopher Wylie told Britain’s Parliament last month that CA also rents out its services as a dirty trickster. Wylie described how his firm collaborated with an Israeli software company called Black Cube to corrupt Nigeria’s recent election by tying a candidate to videotapes of men with beards and big swords chopping people into bloody pieces.

Both Cambridge and Black Cube are spin-offs of global military-and-intelligence businesses, where old soldiers and spies go to make money. Watch for firms like these to do their tricks in future elections here in Our Island Home.

Shrinking social media giants?

Most social media companies make their trillions by gathering data—massive amounts of data worth massive amounts of money, but suddenly, the biggest of them all are in trouble.

According to Guardian reporter Edward Helmore last week: “Trump is going after Amazon; Congress is after Facebook; Google is too big, and Apple is short of new products.” Facebook shares declined more than 17% ($US50 billion) last month after the revelations about their data being mined (as in the previous item).

Combined, Apple, Amazon and Alphabet (Google’s parent company) are worth $US2.3 trillion—Microsoft and Facebook are worth a further $US1.1 trillion, so the Big Five social media and marketing giants make up 15% of the American Standard & Poor share index. As The Guardian put it: “if tech pops … so pops the market,” and yet,“these stocks have been largely detached from any earnings analysis.”

Trump’s tweets against Amazon, unusually, make some sense: “They pay little or no taxes to state and local governments, use our postal system as their delivery boy (causing tremendous loss to the US), and are putting many thousands of retailers out of business!” His campaign manager, Brad Pascale added by tweet: “Amazon has probably 10x the data on every American that Facebook does. All that data and own a political newspaper, The Washington Post. Hmm …”

And that folks, is the real reason Trump’s after Amazon, because their high-prestige newspaper keeps exposing his viciously inept government and his own grotesque self.

Meanwhile, Avaaz, a global social media advocacy group, is demanding that Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook use independent audits to delete fake accounts (global governments, hackers and crooks have tens of millions of them), notify users every time they are exposed to fake or malicious content—and correct the record, and fund an independent army of fact-checkers big enough and fast enough to stem the spread of lies.

Avaaz is asking a lot, and it blithely assumes a corporate and/or government body can judge what is “fake” or “malicious”, but as their petition to Zuckerberg states: “Crucial elections are just months away. Facebook’s motto used to be Move Fast and Break Things. Now you need to Move Fast and Fix Things.”

Which side is America’s god on?

The American Journal Sociology of Religion reports that Trump’s firmest support is coming from Christian nationalists. These people may or may not be evangelicals, but their core idea is that American society and politics must be suffused with Christianity because their nation has “a particular relationship with the Christian God”, which is apparently represented in Trump’s policies and programs. (They don’t care if he himself is grotesque.)

Nothing better illustrates the wild variations of beliefs among the American people than comparing that notion with this, from the extraordinary sermon Martin Luther King gave on April 4, 1967, exactly one year before he was assassinated, 50 years ago:

”We can no longer afford to worship the god of hate or bow before the altar of retaliation. … If we do not act [to bring peace to Vietnam and justice for all], we shall surely be dragged down the long, dark, and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.”

Phillip Frazer writes righteously at coorabellridge.com

20 responses to “Things you might have missed this week

  1. The point about the photo is in part its value in identifying sinister narrow mindedness. But also important to highlight it given the authoritarian response of wanting it taken down.

    Compare the poster for Orwell’s 1984

    https://goo.gl/images/x4FSGg

  2. As I write there is a burgeoning campaign to rehabilitate Steve `Sandpaper’ Smith and his two teammates. It will probably because while Australians desire sporting success more than they deplore cheats.
    Link that national trait with the other facet of Australia, a love of `strong’ leadership, and you have a problem.
    Add on the existence of massive, capital friendly mega data organisations as noted elsewhere in this article and Peter Dutton for President does not sound outlandish at all.

  3. Dtton is amonster. God help us if he gets to be pm. He has no empathy or compassion. He was useless as minister for health. So why is this man given all this power. Hes deporting people who have lived all there lives in this country. These prople are isolated on xmas island. Why isnt anyone helping them. They are not all paedos rapists and murderers. They learnt life here. So they are no different to aussie crims. Is dutton going to round up all of them and stick them on an island.

  4. Any politician who can come out with crass, all out cruelty of statements, complete inability to visualise truth in any of it’s forms, rigidity of right-wing beliefs, disdain for other human beings, ambitious clap trap-all on a daily basis, followed by piteous complaints in the Twittersphere, telling everyone he is nothing like his dreadful image, deserves everything he gets. And I, for one, hope he does get it.

  5. Clearly, Phillip knows a dickhead when he sees one. Possibly each morning in the mirror. What piffle. BTW. he also didn’t;t read the poll on Friday. Turnbull ain’t going anywhere. I know that’s a tragedy for the luvvies at DR. And BTW, isn’t this supposed to be an ‘arts review’. Seriously, you don’t help your cause of asking for support for independent journalism if this is what you mean.

      1. The people possibly have the same view as they do at elections, they prefer the least worst option. Who could possibly challenge Mr Fraudband, and have any hope of winning an election? The fact that ninnies like Dutton, Tehan, and Tudge have risen to near the top really reflects the paucity of talent and ability in the dungheap that is the modern Liberal Party.

  6. I too am not keen on the Dickhead description because it suggests an element of animal and does not actually describe this robotic weird creature which has taken over the LNP collective brains.
    Problem is that Australians have also forgotten about Ethics and Morality and given the amount of False Facts strewn around one can understand that they are tricky concepts to grasp.

  7. I’m actually looking forward to Dutton as PM. He’s so incompetent, cruel, and bereft of ideas, his “leadership” will see the Liberals consigned to the wilderness for a generation, and possibly disappear altogether. Speed the day!

    1. In a way yes me too. Dutton would be grotesque as PM BUT I suspect Dutton wants to use the “super ministry” he now controls to pervert the democratic process. Its gone under the radar but its been said before that all the metadata around would be used against Dutton’s enemies. I suspect Dutton thinks he can stage a Trump- like win somehow.

  8. Referring to Dutton as a ‘dickhead’ because you don’t like his politics makes your journalistic analysis suspect and the use of Peatlings Dutton photo is immature.

    1. You may not like the concept of Dutton being referred to as a ‘dickhead’ in terms of his politics, but peter whether you like it or not you need to prove your case as Phillip Frazer did.. Whether you like it, Dutton through the current frame of politics that is what he is, would you prefer incompetent, completely out of touch with the real world, by any other name you note that he is immature, this is a dangerous & politically damaging combination. But we need to be realistic if the LNP/Nats are going to self immolate so be it…

    1. Yes Unfortunately his rigidity is problematic, but the Coalition seems to have taken him on as their poster boy, without taking into consideration his failings which could not only be disastrous for the party but also Australia’s future…..

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Newsletter Signup